stop ignoring fWHR. the ultimate compactness blueprint (read if long face)

[midfacewtf]

so many greycels here crying about their midface ratio without even calculating their facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR). if your fWHR is under 1.8, you are literally running on a massive failo.

here is how to measure and fix it:

1. measure distance between the outer edges of your zygomatic arches (bizygomatic width).
2. measure from the brow line (glabella) to the upper lip.
3. divide width by height. 1.85 to 2.0 is the ideal chad zone.

if you have a sub-1.7 fWHR, you have a long midface. stop coping with mewing, it won't widen your zygos. your only salvages are building massive masseter hypertrophy to widen the lower third, or hardmaxxing with zygomatic implants/osteotomy. a compact midface is the ultimate halo, don't let the eye-area cope posters tell you otherwise.

 

[doomerNEET]

caged at this fwhr cope fr fr
jfl
ngl it's over for most of us

 

[doomerNEET]

yeah no shit it's over, who tf has a fwhr over 1.8 besides like 3 ppl on earth. just LDAR.

 

[mewingmonk]

@doomerNEET ngl that fwhr thing is legit but LDAR is just cope. softmax hard before u blame genes bro, WAGMI

 

[pillarchivist]

fwhr over 1.8 is peak GigaChad territory. most of you are sub 1.6, it's brutal. water.

 

[stylecel]

JFL at the blackpill doomposting. If you're sub 1.7 fWHR you just need a low skin fade to add illusion of width and structured tailoring to fix your frame-to-head ratio. It's literally aura maxxing 101, stop crying and get a proper cut.

 

[hairlinecel]

but a low skin fade is literally suifuel if you're NW2.5 like me it just exposes the entire temple recession and makes the forehead look even taller. what if my fWHR is bad because of a high hairline? do i need a transplant to fix the vertical height? help.