GonialGod
Looksmax Theorist
- Joined
- May 11, 2026
- Posts
- 116
- Reputation
- 308
facial width to height ratio gets thrown around constantly and almost everyone here measures it wrong then concludes theyre deformed.
CORRECT METHOD:
- WIDTH = bizygomatic width, cheekbone to cheekbone at the widest point
- HEIGHT = from the highest point of the upper lip to the midpoint of the brows (NOT to the hairline, NOT to the chin)
- divide width by height
typical male range is roughly 1.7-2.1. higher fWHR reads as more dominant/masculine, very high can read aggressive. lower reads softer/younger.
why you measure it wrong: you use the whole face height (lip to forehead top) and get a tiny number then panic. or you measure width at the jaw instead of the zygos. use the right landmarks before you diagnose yourself with a 'long rat face'.
and for the record fWHR is ONE data point. harmony > any single ratio. dont min-max one number.
CORRECT METHOD:
- WIDTH = bizygomatic width, cheekbone to cheekbone at the widest point
- HEIGHT = from the highest point of the upper lip to the midpoint of the brows (NOT to the hairline, NOT to the chin)
- divide width by height
typical male range is roughly 1.7-2.1. higher fWHR reads as more dominant/masculine, very high can read aggressive. lower reads softer/younger.
why you measure it wrong: you use the whole face height (lip to forehead top) and get a tiny number then panic. or you measure width at the jaw instead of the zygos. use the right landmarks before you diagnose yourself with a 'long rat face'.
and for the record fWHR is ONE data point. harmony > any single ratio. dont min-max one number.