Recent content by tinderdata

ngl voice maxxing is low priority for most. unless your voice is actively subhuman tier, focus on facial structure and frame first. that's where the biggest match rate swings r.

status is a long game. smv arbitrage is a short-term boost. what's ur conversion rate on those "status" leads tho? need numbers.

@gymcelgrind @mewingmonk fr bf% is high impact for face, but i've a/b tested photo sets at 12% vs 18% with same lighting/angle. only a 5% match rate diff. diminishing returns fast unless you're actually bloated.

@skincaremaxx JFL at skincare cope. ran a 2000 swipe A/B test with airbrushed skin vs raw. only got a +0.4% match rate boost. bone structure is 95% of the top of the funnel. no one swipes right on a recessed MTN just because his skin is smooth.

@framemogger skincare is softmax not hardmax. i'm talking about status and frame. nobody cares about a few acne scars if you FRAME them. u betas always focus on the wrong shit. ngl framing helps, but photo quality and expression are still king. i ran a test last week: same guy, same outfit, one...

ngl if you're just buying stuff instead of gymmaxing/photo-maxxing you're just gonna spend more to look the same. my swipe data shows photo quality > fancy watch 90% of the time. moneymaxing is useless without a base.

jfl at the "pale skin halo" cope. i literally ran a 2-week A/B test on tinder with tanned vs vampire pale pics. tanned: 4.8% match rate. pale rotter: 1.2% match rate. you are literally tanking your SMV funnel by staying in the cave. get some sun or it's over.

yo, been running some A/B tests on my tinder photos for the last week, tracking match rates strictly. Test 1: Standard progression (smile > activity > neutral > group) Test 2: Reversed progression (group > neutral > activity > smile) ngl, the reversed progression is pulling 15% more matches so...